"Just Keep Going Until They Are Gone!" Fetterman's Unbelievable Call.
Once again, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania defied the rest of his party, this time by opposing an attempt on Wednesday to pass a war powers resolution that would force President Donald Trump to limit actions against Iran.
Supporters of the measure, along with a related one in the House known as war powers resolutions, recognized that they faced significant challenges due to the near-unanimous backing for the war among the Republicans who control Congress. However, they emphasized that the votes were still important as a way to test lawmakers, especially considering Trump’s opposition to seeking congressional approval for the joint Israeli-American operations against Iran.
The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on another measure this Thursday, which also encounters significant hurdles. This is partly because a small group of pro-Israel Democrats has introduced competing legislation, The Intercept reported.
While Fetterman opposed the Senate bill, one Republican – Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky – sided with Democrats in supporting it.
Fetterman said on Wednesday that Trump’s actions to destroy Iran’s nuclear ambitions was “entirely appropriate” and that U.S. and Israeli forces should continue to target whoever is selected to succeed slain Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“Just keep killing them until they’re gone,” Fetterman told CNN’s Kate Bolduan on CNN News Central.
“I absolutely support that. I think that’s entirely appropriate until hopefully they’ll pick someone that realizes that they need to live and coexist in peace in the region and stop trying to destroy Israel and to stabilize the region,” he added.
Khamenei, who served as the supreme leader for over three decades, was killed in joint U.S. and Israeli strikes early Saturday morning that targeted his compound and Iran’s nuclear program.
Some international media reports indicate that Iran’s Assembly of Experts chose Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, as his successor on Tuesday; however, this has not been confirmed by state media, The Hill reported.
An Israeli airstrike reportedly struck the building during a meeting of officials who were voting.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz warned on Wednesday that any leader appointed by the regime would be “an unequivocal target for elimination.”
“It does not matter what his name is or the place where he hides,” Katz wrote in a post on the social platform X, describing the plot as an “integral part of the objectives” of the ongoing military operation.
“We will continue to act with full force, together with our American partners, to crush the regime’s capabilities and create the conditions for the Iranian people to overthrow it and replace it,” Katz continued.
Israel has clearly stated its goal of pursuing regime change in Iran, while U.S. officials have emphasized that nation-building is not part of their agenda. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have described the mission as focused on eliminating nuclear and missile threats, despite President Trump encouraging the Iranian people to “take over” their government.
During a press conference on Tuesday, Trump mentioned that “most of the people” he envisioned leading Iran next are already deceased. He cautioned that the worst-case scenario would be a successor who is as extreme or even more extreme than Khamenei.
“I guess the worst case would be we do this and then somebody takes over who’s as bad as the previous person, right? That could happen, we don’t want that to happen, it would probably be the worst,” he said.
Pennsylvania’s other senator, Dave McCormack, a Republican, also voted against the Democrat-led war powers resolution.
Iranian officials told U.S. negotiators ahead of military operations that the country had managed to hide its nuclear weapons development from international monitors while enriching enough uranium for at least 11 bombs.
Viral Immigration Records Spark Heated Clash Between Digital Authenticity and Historical Context
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A photograph currently circulating on social media platforms has reignited a complex discussion regarding the historical immigration records of former First Lady Melania Trump. The image, which some online users claim shows a connection to the Jeffrey Epstein investigative materials, has prompted experts to provide clarity on standard modeling industry practices during the 1990s.
Standard Immigration Procedures for International Models
Legal analysts and immigration experts emphasize that the document in question—if authentic—likely reflects the standard administrative path for international talent entering the United States during that era.
The EB-1 "Extraordinary Ability" Visa: It is a matter of public record that Melania Trump was granted an EB-1 visa in 2001, a category reserved for individuals with acclaimed professional achievements. 📑
Agency Sponsorship: During the 1990s, it was standard procedure for modeling agencies or established business entities to act as sponsors for H-1B or O-1 visas.
The "Einstein Visa" Moniker: While some online discourse uses the term "Epstein Visa," experts clarify that the EB-1 is colloquially known as the "Einstein Visa" due to its high standards for entry.
Verification Challenges in the Digital Age
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(767x236:769x238)/donald-trump-melania-trump-031326-d2ff8463de1e43a18cd75533e48f55e7.jpg)
The emergence of this photograph highlights the significant challenge of separating verified investigative data from unconfirmed social media claims.
Lack of Official Confirmation: As of March 20, 2026, no federal agency, including the DOJ or USCIS, has verified a direct link between the former First Lady’s immigration filings and the Epstein investigative archives.
Contextual Misinterpretation: Supporters of the former First Lady argue that circulating individual pages without a full case file often leads to misleading narratives, especially in high-profile political environments. 🛡️
Digital Forensics: Observers note that in an era of sophisticated digital manipulation, the authenticity of any "leaked" image must be subjected to rigorous forensic review before being accepted as evidentiary fact.
Impact on the Broader Epstein Investigation
The focus on viral imagery comes amid the continued release of nearly three million pages of documents related to the Epstein case, a process that continues to fuel public demand for transparency.
Information Overload: The sheer volume of records released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act has created an environment where unverified snippets can quickly go viral, potentially obscuring legitimate investigative findings. ⚖️
The Threshold for Evidence: Legal commentators stress that "association" or the presence of a name in an administrative record does not constitute proof of a criminal connection or unusual favor.
Institutional Integrity: The controversy underscores the need for responsible reporting and a reliance on authenticated, primary sources to maintain the integrity of the ongoing national conversation. 📌
Trump Dragged Into Epstein Scandal as Logs Come to Light
1. The "May Briefing" Revelation
New reports from March 25, 2026, indicate that Attorney General Pam Bondi privately informed President Trump as early as May 2025 that his name appeared in investigative documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Internal Briefings: The meeting reportedly included Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. While the White House characterizes this as a "routine briefing," the timing suggests it may have triggered the administration’s recent aggressive stance against the release of the files. 📑
Context of Mention: Being mentioned in the files does not inherently imply criminal wrongdoing. Trump’s former social ties to Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s are well-documented, but the refusal to disclose the nature of these mentions is fueling public speculation. ⚖️
Official Stance: White House spokesperson Steven Cheung maintains that Trump cut ties with Epstein decades ago at Mar-a-Lago, labeling him a "creep" long before the 2008 or 2019 charges. 🛡️
2. The Congressional "GOP Revolt"
In a significant break from party discipline, key Republican members of the House Oversight Committee have joined Democrats to demand transparency.
Subpoena Power: The committee voted 8-2 to subpoena the Department of Justice (DOJ) for the Epstein files. High-profile MAGA Republicans, including Nancy Mace and Scott Perry, voted in favor, signaling a genuine desire for accountability within the base. 🏛️
Ghislaine Maxwell Testimony: The committee also moved to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell. Concerns have been raised regarding Todd Blanche’s planned meeting with her, as critics fear the potential use of presidential pardon power to influence her testimony. ⚖️
Public Perception: A March 2026 poll shows that only 40% of Republicans approve of how the President is handling the Epstein issue, while 36% disapprove, indicating a rare moment of vulnerability among his core supporters. 📉
3. The "Obama Distraction" Strategy
To counter the mounting Epstein headlines, the administration has revived a classic political tactic: targeting former President Barack Obama.
The Coup Allegation: Trump and Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard have accused the Obama administration of "manufacturing" intelligence regarding 2016 Russian election interference to stage a "coup" against Trump. 🛡️
Intelligence Consensus: Analysts note that Gabbard's claims contradict the 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which confirmed that Russia did interfere to help Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton. 📑
The Immunity Irony: Even as Trump calls for Obama’s prosecution, his own 2025 Supreme Court victory regarding presidential immunity would legally prevent his predecessor from being indicted for official acts. ⚖️
