Globalists panicking right now. Kash Patel targets Soros. FBI follows the money!
Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., is calling on the Department of Justice to launch an immediate investigation into organizations funded by billionaire George Soros, citing growing concerns about political violence and domestic extremism.
In a letter sent Thursday to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Carter requested a “comprehensive and immediate” probe into the Open Society Foundations and other Soros-backed groups, alleging that several have supported or incited politically motivated violence.
“The funding of organizations that engage in, support, or incite political violence must not be tolerated,” Carter wrote in his letter.
Carter cited findings from a recent report by the Capital Research Center, which detailed how Soros’ Open Society Foundations distributed more than $80 million to groups accused of endorsing or participating in activities that fit the FBI’s definition of domestic terrorism.
According to the report, one such group — the Center for Third World Organizing (CTWO) — received $400,000 from the foundation and publicly stated it “threw down with people in the streets” during the 2020 George Floyd riots. The report further identified CTWO affiliates such as the Ruckus Society, which has circulated materials promoting protest tactics that “may be outside of the law.”
Another organization in the same network, the BlackOUT Collective, co-authored a pro-Hamas guide that cited the Ruckus Society and praised the October 7 terror attack on Israel.
The Open Society Foundations also provided $1.85 million to Dream Defenders, $18 million to the Movement for Black Lives, and $200,000 to Dissenters — all named in the report for connections to the same guide. The Sunrise Movement, which has promoted the “Stop Cop City/Defend the Atlanta Forest” campaign, reportedly received more than $2 million in Open Society grants. Federal authorities have linked that campaign to Antifa-associated anarchist activity.
Carter warned that these revelations point to “an escalation in politically motivated violence from far-left extremist groups.” He referenced attacks on Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities and the September 10 assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk as examples of the consequences of radicalization.
“The DOJ cannot ignore this,” Carter said. “Americans deserve to know whether these organizations are funding, organizing, or inspiring domestic terrorism.”
The Open Society Foundations denied the allegations, calling them politically motivated.
“Our activities are peaceful and lawful, and our grantees are expected to abide by human rights principles and comply with the law,” the foundation said in a statement. “These claims are attacks on civil society meant to silence speech the administration disagrees with and undermine the First Amendment.”
The Trump administration has already begun coordinating efforts to trace financial support for left-wing extremism.
FBI Director Kash Patel said Wednesday that the bureau is “following the money” behind Antifa and related far-left groups.
Patel described the effort as an “unprecedented financial investigation” into the donor networks and organizational infrastructure enabling domestic violence and unrest.
“The FBI is working with the Treasury Department to map accounts and entities funneling money to extremist organizations across the U.S. and abroad,” Patel said.
“We are following the money. Money never lies,” Patel continued. “That’s what it’s going to take to bring down this network of organized criminal thugs, gang bangers, and yes, domestic terrorists — because that’s what they are.”
Carter said Patel’s comments underscored the importance of a Justice Department inquiry into Soros-backed groups.
“The American people deserve transparency,” Carter said. “If any organization is using foreign money to fuel domestic violence or undermine law enforcement, it must be exposed and prosecuted.”
Viral Immigration Records Spark Heated Clash Between Digital Authenticity and Historical Context
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A photograph currently circulating on social media platforms has reignited a complex discussion regarding the historical immigration records of former First Lady Melania Trump. The image, which some online users claim shows a connection to the Jeffrey Epstein investigative materials, has prompted experts to provide clarity on standard modeling industry practices during the 1990s.
Standard Immigration Procedures for International Models
Legal analysts and immigration experts emphasize that the document in question—if authentic—likely reflects the standard administrative path for international talent entering the United States during that era.
The EB-1 "Extraordinary Ability" Visa: It is a matter of public record that Melania Trump was granted an EB-1 visa in 2001, a category reserved for individuals with acclaimed professional achievements. 📑
Agency Sponsorship: During the 1990s, it was standard procedure for modeling agencies or established business entities to act as sponsors for H-1B or O-1 visas.
The "Einstein Visa" Moniker: While some online discourse uses the term "Epstein Visa," experts clarify that the EB-1 is colloquially known as the "Einstein Visa" due to its high standards for entry.
Verification Challenges in the Digital Age
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(767x236:769x238)/donald-trump-melania-trump-031326-d2ff8463de1e43a18cd75533e48f55e7.jpg)
The emergence of this photograph highlights the significant challenge of separating verified investigative data from unconfirmed social media claims.
Lack of Official Confirmation: As of March 20, 2026, no federal agency, including the DOJ or USCIS, has verified a direct link between the former First Lady’s immigration filings and the Epstein investigative archives.
Contextual Misinterpretation: Supporters of the former First Lady argue that circulating individual pages without a full case file often leads to misleading narratives, especially in high-profile political environments. 🛡️
Digital Forensics: Observers note that in an era of sophisticated digital manipulation, the authenticity of any "leaked" image must be subjected to rigorous forensic review before being accepted as evidentiary fact.
Impact on the Broader Epstein Investigation
The focus on viral imagery comes amid the continued release of nearly three million pages of documents related to the Epstein case, a process that continues to fuel public demand for transparency.
Information Overload: The sheer volume of records released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act has created an environment where unverified snippets can quickly go viral, potentially obscuring legitimate investigative findings. ⚖️
The Threshold for Evidence: Legal commentators stress that "association" or the presence of a name in an administrative record does not constitute proof of a criminal connection or unusual favor.
Institutional Integrity: The controversy underscores the need for responsible reporting and a reliance on authenticated, primary sources to maintain the integrity of the ongoing national conversation. 📌
Trump Dragged Into Epstein Scandal as Logs Come to Light
1. The "May Briefing" Revelation
New reports from March 25, 2026, indicate that Attorney General Pam Bondi privately informed President Trump as early as May 2025 that his name appeared in investigative documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Internal Briefings: The meeting reportedly included Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. While the White House characterizes this as a "routine briefing," the timing suggests it may have triggered the administration’s recent aggressive stance against the release of the files. 📑
Context of Mention: Being mentioned in the files does not inherently imply criminal wrongdoing. Trump’s former social ties to Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s are well-documented, but the refusal to disclose the nature of these mentions is fueling public speculation. ⚖️
Official Stance: White House spokesperson Steven Cheung maintains that Trump cut ties with Epstein decades ago at Mar-a-Lago, labeling him a "creep" long before the 2008 or 2019 charges. 🛡️
2. The Congressional "GOP Revolt"
In a significant break from party discipline, key Republican members of the House Oversight Committee have joined Democrats to demand transparency.
Subpoena Power: The committee voted 8-2 to subpoena the Department of Justice (DOJ) for the Epstein files. High-profile MAGA Republicans, including Nancy Mace and Scott Perry, voted in favor, signaling a genuine desire for accountability within the base. 🏛️
Ghislaine Maxwell Testimony: The committee also moved to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell. Concerns have been raised regarding Todd Blanche’s planned meeting with her, as critics fear the potential use of presidential pardon power to influence her testimony. ⚖️
Public Perception: A March 2026 poll shows that only 40% of Republicans approve of how the President is handling the Epstein issue, while 36% disapprove, indicating a rare moment of vulnerability among his core supporters. 📉
3. The "Obama Distraction" Strategy
To counter the mounting Epstein headlines, the administration has revived a classic political tactic: targeting former President Barack Obama.
The Coup Allegation: Trump and Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard have accused the Obama administration of "manufacturing" intelligence regarding 2016 Russian election interference to stage a "coup" against Trump. 🛡️
Intelligence Consensus: Analysts note that Gabbard's claims contradict the 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which confirmed that Russia did interfere to help Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton. 📑
The Immunity Irony: Even as Trump calls for Obama’s prosecution, his own 2025 Supreme Court victory regarding presidential immunity would legally prevent his predecessor from being indicted for official acts. ⚖️
